I really
enjoyed reading Antecedents and
Consequences of Online Social Networking Behavior: The Case of Facebook by
Adam Acar. I liked how the article was
setup with some background information about the different social networks and
how popular each one was at the time this article was written. I also liked how Acar defined the different factors
he would be looking at such as anxiety, self-esteem, body image, extroversion,
and gender. I thought Acar asked the
right questions when there wasn't a consistent view on a certain area and I
agreed with all of his hypothesis that he made throughout the experiment.
As the
initial goal of the experiment was to compare online social networks to real
social networks in terms of size, I knew that the online social network would
be bigger in the end. The text states,
real social networks include "family members, relatives, neighbors and
colleagues as well as friends" (Acar 77), while online includes all of
these but also people that are acquaintances and strangers. I wasn't surprised to see the result that
Facebook had one and a half times the number more than a real social network. I looked at my own Facebook and most of the
hypothesis were spot on as girls typically had more friends than guys and that
people with low self-esteem had more strangers as "friends" on their
profile. Overall, this article was
helpful in looking at social networks in a different light in regards to how
the different factors listed above effect a person's profile. Although Acar had a small sample size, his
work was influential because it seems to be some of the first on this topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment